The U.S. Constitution - Decoded!
  • Home
  • Events; Links to articles
    • Forefather's Monument Tour 19Oct2013
    • Badnarik Talk - photos
  • Study Group Schedule
  • Quotes from the Founders & Framers
  • Constitution Blog
  • Videos & Text of Talks
    • GBTP Tax Day Rally April 13, 2014
    • GBTP Tax Day Rally Video
    • M&P Interview Jan 2014
    • Activate Worcester #1
    • Activate Worcester #2
    • Speak Out! Chelmsford TeleMedia - Part One
    • Rally to Repeal Obamacare
  • Learn the Constitution - section by section
    • Declaration of Independence - the foundation of the new Republic >
      • Declaration of Independence - Introduction and Preamble
      • Declaration of Independence - Treason and Heresy
    • Constitution Principles & Prologue >
      • US Constitution: A Primer, Part One
      • US Constitution: A Primer, Part Two
    • Constitution - The Seven Articles >
      • US Constitution: Article I
      • US Constitution: Article II
      • US Constitution: Article III
      • US Constitution: Article IV
      • US Constitution: Article V
      • US Constitution: Article VI
      • US Constitution: Article VII
    • US Constitution - the Bill of Rights >
      • US Constitution: 1st & 2nd Amendments
      • US Constitution: 3rd-4th-5th Amendments
      • US Constitution - 5th - 6th - 7th - 8th Amendments
      • US Constitution - 9th Amendment

New Year's Day 2016

1/1/2016

6 Comments

 
The theme for this year will be the ideals and principles stated so clearly in the Declaration of Independence, and how the Constitution is an attempt to make of those ideals a working system of governance for the people.

This is something that had never and HAS never been done before – or since.  Countries are founded by conquest; conquest of land, vanquishing of a foe or foes.  Countries are founded by expansion; we have more people we’ll just scoot over and include this bit.  Countries are founded by secession or revolution; usually in anger but sometimes (as in New Zealand, Australia, and Canada) by mutual agreement. 

The United States did have to rebel and then fight a war – but unlike other countries we started from IDEALS.  These ideals grew out of the religious principles that originally brought Englishmen to this land, that they be able worship according to conscience and religious ideals.

Ideals are odd things.  We see them up ahead and above us.  We want to achieve them.  Yet reaching them is ALWAYS beyond our ability.  However, by striving we get much farther than ever we could by an admission that “this is too far; let’s not try.” 

And still as a country we are roundly castigated in any area where we fail to meet those ideals.  Those are supposedly “proof” that we didn’t really mean them (and therefore are the most vile and despicable of people), or that we are hypocrites, or that they are a cover for hateful and racist acts behind a veneer of self-righteous pseudo-sanctity.   Always, to cure these “abject failures of our evil system” all that is “needed” is to overthrow that system and substitute a system off someone else’s shelf and all will be well; we will achieve these Utopian goals and butterflies and unicorns will grace our cities.

What ideals are in the Declaration of Independence? 

  • That all humans are created equal in rights; equal in inherent worth; to be treated equally under the Rule of Law; equally worthy of the respect of every other human for our shared origin as creations of God.  (You are an atheist? –That’s fine; the writers of the Declaration were not.  Put on your big kid pants and deal with that historical fact.)
  • That all humans were endowed by God with Rights.  Those rights are inherent in us, and because they are inherent in us those rights pre-date, transcend, and supersede ALL government.
  • That the true and correct purpose of government is to secure (defend, protect, guard from danger, make certain, hold inviolate, put beyond hazard) those rights.
  • That the people may (perhaps must?) change any government  which becomes destructive of the very rights it is its job is to protect.

In future posts during 2016 – perhaps a new section of this web site – we will explore those ideals and principles further. 

In liberty, wishing you always to have ideals of your own to strive towards:  Happy New Year!


6 Comments

Constitution Day 2014

9/17/2014

12 Comments

 
Happy Constitution Day!  


In the week that includes this day, September 17th, both federal law and laws in all 50 states REQUIRE that the US Constitution be taught in the public schools.  Most schools ignore this requirement.  When it is brought to their attention, many school actively FIGHT complying.  (We can reserve for another time a discussion as to whether the federal government has the power to require this teaching -- but certainly the states do, in their publicly-funded schools.)


Be sure that  YOUR children, grandchildren, nieces, nephews, neighbor's children, Scouts, et cetera, get this information.  There are excellent online resources and the As A Mom group has a special resources page located at this link: Read It Save It.  


Spreading understanding of our Constitution is crucial: without the underpinning of the principles in the Declaration of Independence, and knowledge of how those principles were turned into civil governance BY the Constitution, all the political activity taking place can and will be twisted by those antithetical to freedom.  


But we have to start earlier than politics, and even earlier than understanding the Constitution and the LIMITED federal government it created.  We have to start with ourselves.  


I have been watching the lead-up to the big vote (tomorrow!) in Scotland whether to stay as part of the UK or to break free.  These descendants of William Wallace, who risked everything for freedom -- how will they vote?  For the freedom their forebears died to obtain?  Or will they remain with the UK?  Despite all the rhetoric going on, a crucial point no one will speak about openly is the British welfare system.  So many people in the UK live "on the dole" in one way or another -- and Scotland has always been more short of cash than the southern reaches of the island.  I see the potential for a vote-by-pocketbook, where a majority of the population votes to ensure that the "free" money streaming up from the richer cities of England keeps coming.  A song by the Proclaimers cries, "I can't understand why we let someone else rule our land, cap in hand."  The answer is:  handouts.  Good luck to the Scots; whichever way they decide tomorrow there will be rancor and repercussions.  


So why the segue into Scottish politics?  Because the same forces are at work here.  We have forgotten our Constitution.  We have forgotten WHY the federal government was to be SEVERELY restricted and limited in scope.  People assume government is supposed to control every aspect of their lives - and most want it so, either for their own benefit or to control others (always, of course, for "their own good" - which always leads to great evil, as I have posted before).  


We have also lost civility - the ability to live together under rules of common politeness and with respect for others' wishes to live their own lives in peace.  We are no longer "permitted" (i.e., we allow the severely offensive rules of "political correctness" to self-censor for fear of excoriation by thoughtless, hate-filled -- but LOUD -- people who seek control of public discourse) to hold or speak any but MSM-approved drivel-opinions without enduring censure and name-calling.  We have lost respect for EVERYONE - all thugs are seen as helpless victims, reacting to the terrible (and white-patriarchy-caused) circumstances of their lives, unable to choose (because the left's "sympathy" for the poor is based on deep-seated, deeply-hidden hatred and disgust for them) to act differently.  Because (the underlying assumption is) they are all eternal children who cannot grow up and can never be responsible for their own choices.  Anyone wishing to protect themselves from thuggery is called hate-filled.  


None of that is true.  


What HAS happened is loss of understanding of those principles in the Declaration of Independence.  Those principles - that all are EQUAL (in the eyes of the law, in inherent rights, and as beloved children of God), and have the right to live their own LIFE (and protect that life - else you have NO "right" to your life) in LIBERTY (free from interference by government except in matters where you infringe the rights of others by crimes), and to pursue "happiness" - which is the Platonic Ideal of excellence in your own fields of endeavor.  It's ALL there, in the Declaration and the Constitution -- waiting for us to rediscover it.  So that ALL people in this nation can make their lives examples of the triumph of their individual human spirits.


I will end this post with two notes from the renowned expert and scholar on the US Constitution, Publius Huldah.  They are on the "Ask Questions" page of her web site (linked below) - but there are no direct links to individual responses, so you will have to dig a bit to see them in their native habitat.  All emphases are in the originals.


Link to Publius Huldah's "Ask Questions" page.




From Publius Huldah's Ask Questions on September 15th (two days ago), in response to a post by "Jim": 


"The Bible? What’s that?
The Constitution? Are you serious? Don’t you know the supreme Court decides what it means?

The above is what most people believe. It’s a lie – but they believe it.

Alexander Hamilton told us long ago that when federal judges usurp powers, the remedy is IMPEACHMENT! Federalist Paper No. 81 (8th para).
Members of Congress are never impeached: They may be expelled by their respective Houses. Art. I, Sec. 5, cl. 2


But Jim – the problem is not the judges or the people in Congress. The problem is WE THE PEOPLE who are so ignorant and morally blind that we elect the people in Congress, we elect the President who appoints the federal judges, and we elect the US Senators who confirm them.

Our Framers said over & over that our system depends on the American People having the virtue and intelligence to elect men of virtue and intelligence to office."


and Jim's response:  "The Bible and Constitution? Therein lies the problem. It is true that the People are no longer even familiar with the Bible or the Constitution. With the Bible being removed from the schools, which previously was encouraged and contains our voting instructions, Exodus 18:21, if it were taught. The Constitution not being taught let alone our History, even common civics, the fundamental functions and operations of our local governments are not even taught, nor is there a desire to learn or be a part of. Our schools fail us on intelligence, delivering diplomas instead of knowledge. Our Churches fail us on virtues with their fear of being holy. And both fail us in wisdom? I fear our fate with this ignorance and apathy among the populace."



And me, so you needn't go look up the verse referred to in the text:  Exodus 18:21 (NASB) "Furthermore, you shall select out of all the people able men who fear God, men of truth, those who hate dishonest gain; and you shall place these over them as leaders of thousands, of hundreds, of fifties and of tens.



And more from her commentary, just yesterday, in response to "Spence" in a discussion of the (truly insidiously evil) proposal for a Convention of the States (COS):
"I know, Son. That is one of the things which is so infuriating about the COS conspirators. They actually have grass roots people believing that a convention is how THE STATES will rein in the feds. BUT THE STATES HAVE BEEN TOTALLY COMPLICIT IN THE TRANSFER OF OUR RESERVED POWERS TO THE FEDS.

The morally blind & profoundly ignorant American People elected everyone in Washington DC – or they were appointed or hired by someone whom the American People elected. Same for our corrupt State governments. Some of the brain dead people who have jumped on the convention bandwagon actually think they will elect the delegates. Of course they won’t – but even if they did, they would just elect more corrupt people to be delegates.

We are drowning in a sea of Ignorance, moral corruption, and Lies. This is not a good time to put our Constitution on the chopping block."


On this Constitution Day, 2014, may we all re-dedicate ourselves to learning our Founding Principles.  And may God have mercy on us all and aid us in our efforts to restore the Constitution and the nation that He inspired.  

12 Comments

Worcester Tea Party and WT&G

11/6/2013

4 Comments

 
EDITED after receiving updated information.


The link provided at the bottom of this post is to an article printed in the Worcester Telegram & Gazette about the Worcester Tea Party meeting where "George and Poppy Carlton" were being filmed by the BBC last Monday.  


The author of the (generally good) article has fallen afoul of the "yellow journalism" trick of sensationalism.


The BBC crew presented itself as engaged in an actual documentary, however the siblings were seemingly too perfect for their roles -- and their names were withheld until that evening, that no one could research them beforehand.  While later searches did find them (see comments section) and bore out their background story, either upper-crust British stereotypes really are true, these two got some very careful pre-filming coaching, or both.    


The trick in the article was to quote out of context a long series of exchanges, presenting the final sentence as a jarring and extreme step.  Poppy pushed very hard, for several questions (interestingly enough for someone who later said several times she had "never heard of" the US Constitution), on whether or not I personally "like" Mr. Obama.  I hold no opinion on "liking" him; I have never met him (and I pointed out that many who intensely disliked GW Bush's policies said he was very personable and likable face-to-face).  On Mr. Obama's policies and his single-minded determination to "fundamentally transform" this country into a socialist dystopia, I do hold strong opinions.  It is also demonstrably TRUE that his actions include severely breaking the oath he swore to "preserve, protect, and defend the CONSTITUTION of the United States from ALL enemies, foreign and domestic."  Additionally, it is demonstrably true that he has given aid, arms, comfort, and succor to those who are self-avowed sworn enemies of this country ("Fast and Furious" arming enemy drug lords in Mexico, illicit gun-running to various Al Qaeda-linked groups in the Middle East, a hard-pushed plan to aid Syrian rebels who ARE Al Qaeda, support for the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and elsewhere, aid to Libyan rebels... the list goes on and on).  "Treason" is defined in  the Constitution in Article III, Section 3, and Clause 1:  "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort." Go read it for yourself.  


The interchange with Poppy took several iterations where I spoke specifically about principles and policies, currently being actively implemented, which are antithetical to the Constitution and to the principles upon which this country was founded.  I also spoke about the multi-decade long degradation in pursuit of a "progressive" agenda (by BOTH parties) - which is actually the Fabian Socialist agenda (and a nastier group of statists, racists, and eugenicists you will have to look long and hard to find).  The author chose to grab merely the last sentence of a long, carefully built case, for the sake of making one who supports the Rule of Law and the Supreme Law of *this* Land look like an extremist.  Extremists exist; they are the ones currently at work "transforming" this country.  I am not of their number.


I am disappointed that my old home town newspaper has fallen so low as to stoop to crass sensationalism.  However, I do applaud Mr. Foskett for his decision to use Jim Wallace's (of GOAL) very best quote from the evening. We are indeed the only state that licenses a spice.  How ludicrous!


http://www.telegram.com/article/20131105/NEWS/311059895


4 Comments

Principles, NOT personalities!

10/19/2013

2 Comments

 
In my email inbox this morning was yet another in a long string of emails over the last few years of a similar theme.  This one's subject line was "Draft Dr. Ben Carson for President!" 

Dr. Carson - from what we have all seen of him - is a fine, brilliant, honorable man.  But he is NOT a proper candidate for President; he has NO understanding of the Constitutional limitations on government!

Please read his articles, and listen to his interviews.  He shows, again and again, that while his heart is in the right place, he does not know WHY the Constitution limits the power and purview of the federal government.  

Folks, please just STOP jumping on one bandwagon after another and THINK for a bit.  We need to elect people who understand the Constitution -- WHY it was written the way it was, WHY we will ALL be better off without DC's nose in everything we do, why a powerful central government as we have now HURTS THE POOR and PREVENTS them from getting ahead, hurts the environment, prevents access to medical care both physically and financially, and so much more.

Spread the principles of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence and find people in your own towns and states who also understand those and who can run for local office.

DC is the very LAST place where we will see change -- because the change has to come from WE, the PEOPLE, first.  And our power is most easily demonstrated locally.  Change your town; change your county; change your state.   THEN we will see change in DC.  But not through "drafting" for national office people who don't understand the Constitutional limitations of government.


2 Comments

The latest from Publius Huldah

7/28/2013

3 Comments

 
There has been quite a tempest recently regarding a proposed "Parental Rights Amendment" which does, so far as this writer can ascertain, exactly the opposite of what it purports to do.  This is typical behavior of "progressives" (who are not, in fact, progressive at all; rather they seek to forcibly return us to the oligarchic systems we overthrew and denounce din the late 1770's).  
For an excellent analysis of this suggested amendment, one can do no better than to read the latest article by the erudite Publius Huldah, available at

http://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/2013/07/28/parental-rights-god-given-and-unalienable-or-government-granted-and-revocable/
3 Comments

Addressing MANY issues at once

6/27/2013

3 Comments

 
Is the following article by Constitutional scholar par excellence, Publius Huldah.  It addresses a number of issues pertinent to the events of the past few weeks, including today.  The first couple of paragraphs are copied here, with permission -- with a link at the end to the rest of the article.  She does go back and edit from time to time; by linking rather than copying in full, you are assured of the most recent edition.  The only change I have made is to add the word "footnote" where this blog does not support a superscript, and an extra space where two words looked a bit crammed together.

For the non-religious reader, please do not be put off by the title; the principles explained protect your right *not* to believe, and make your life in this country better, as well.  Just as one need not be enamored of the music of Beethoven to appreciate his genius, one need not be a believer to appreciate the underpinnings of our Constitution.


The Biblical Foundation of Our Constitution.
By Publius Huldah.



The English Puritans who came here in the 1630's knew that the Old Testament has a great deal to say about civil government. And they came to build that shining city on a hill.

They did not come here to escape from the World, to wait for the end of the World, and to surrender it to evil.

And so – we became a shining city on a hill. The fundamental act of our Founding, the Declaration of Independence, recognizes the Creator God as the Source of Rights; (footnote 1) and acknowledges that the purpose of civil government is simply to “secure” the Rights God gave us. The Constitution we subsequently ratified was based on God’s model of civil government as set forth in the Bible.

That is why our Country was so much better than what the rest of the World has been.  For the most part, we followed God’s model for civil government; other countries didn’t.

The blessing which flows from God’s model is limited civil government which is under The Law. That is why our Liberty Bell quotes Lev. 25:10 – “Proclaim LIBERTY throughout all the Land unto all the Inhabitants thereof.”

Read the rest here:
http://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/2012/06/23/the-biblical-foundation-of-our-constitution/

3 Comments

More on the 2nd Amendment

6/6/2013

3 Comments

 
Today I came across the article linked below, not dated but relatively recent.  It is excellent, and highly recommended.


Here are a couple of little excerpts, to entice you to go read the entire article.

"What many citizens and legislators do not understand is that the federal government has no right to prevent any law-abiding citizen from owning or possessing ANY firearm. The Constitution and its history is unequivocally clear on this! "


and

" No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this, would be to affirm, that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers, may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid.”  Alexander Hamilton, Federalist Paper #78." 

See the entire article here:
http://www.krisannehall.com/index.php/blog/143-obamas-new-gun-ban-list-a-the-2nd-amendment
3 Comments

Why study the Constitution and its history? It's boring, isn't it?

5/22/2013

1 Comment

 
The best answer to that is a quote from Terry Pratchett, from the Author's Note to his book, "I Shall Wear Midnight" (the Tiffany Aching series is highly recommended, as are all his books).

"It is important that we know where we come from, because if you do not know where you come from, then you don't know where you are, and if you don't know where you are, then you don't know where you're going.  And if you don't know where you're going, you're probably going wrong."

Thanks to years of poor history teachers, I grew up thinking that history was boring and stupid.  Silly, really, when I also loved the stories of my grandparents - which was real history, unlike the dried-and-desiccated leftovers in the textbooks.  

History really is fascinating -- as well as terribly useful.  Much of what we deplore (left and right!) in this country today is a result of our ignorance of our own history and our Constitution.  

Read them.  Study them.  Study particularly the REASONS behind the choices the Framers made when they wrote the document, and how they arrived at their choices.  It is astounding.  
1 Comment

What is it, exactly, that you don't like?

5/7/2013

1 Comment

 
"I just don't like guns," she said.  This was in response to a comment I made about a rifle match I had participated in last week.

But what does this comment actually MEAN?  

"I just don't like fireplace pokers."   "I just don't like hammers."  "I just don't like cars."  "I just don't like bathtubs."  

None of these sentences make any sense whatsoever, and a person who made those statements would receive, at the very least, blank looks of astonishment.   Yet each of the named items is responsible, each year, for far more accidental and intentional deaths -- both in raw numbers and in per-capita numbers -- than firearms.  

The misconception -- a result of a LONG campaign to impugn firearms -- runs so deep we don't even see it any longer.  A gun is a piece of metal, or metal-and-plastic, with NO WILL OF ITS OWN.  

Does she not like freedom?  --We owe our freedom to guns.  The muskets and rifles of the Revolutionary War; the rifles of the Civil War and the Spanish-American War; the Tommy Guns of World War I; the more sophisticated rifles of World War II, Korea, Vietnam... would she have preferred we remain subjects of King George?  Have been overrun by Hitler's troops?  Successfully invaded by Imperial Japan?  

Does she not like public safety?  --The police, National Guard, Border Patrol, and state militias (yes, they still exist), and other groups, are all armed.  Should a police officer have to try to arrest a drug dealer with only a stern countenance as his protection?  Don't be absurd!

No.  The actual indication and actual implication here is that firearms do not belong in the hands of law-abiding citizens.  This could NOT be more wrong.  History shows us, time and again, that when the methods of self-defense are ONLY in the hands of government agents, the inevitable result is INCREASED public violence and murder -- far too often at the hands of the government itself.  

Please see the video "Innocents Betrayed" by the organization Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership -- it is available free on YouTube.  Here is one link:  
_



Ownership of firearms is an essential support of our inherent and unalienable right to life:  what right can you have to your own life without the right, the power, and the duty to protect that life from those who would steal it from you with violence?

A dislike of "guns" -- as though they were independently-willed entities -- is just silly on the face of it.  

"War must be, while we defend our lives against a destroyer who would devour all; but I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory.  I love only that which they defend..."  (LOTR; The Two Towers)
1 Comment

Treaty-Making by the US Federal Government

7/27/2012

4 Comments

 
There has been an enormous number of emails, Tweets, and Facebook posts in the last few days about the proposed UN Arms Treaty and the devastation it would do to the Second Amendment were it to be signed and ratified. 

NOT SO -- IF we know and understand the Constitution!!  Here is a perfect example of why we ALL need to understand this vital Founding Document.

The Constitution gives the Federal government the power to negotiate, sign, and ratify treaties only over areas where We, the People, gave them jurisdiction.  The right to keep and bear arms is our God-given, Constitutionally acknowledged and protected, individual right.  The Second Amendment clearly states that the Federal government has NO authority to abridge this right. 

Therefore, ANY treaty affecting this right would be (in Jefferson's words) a "usurpation of powers not granted; null and void." 

However we need to KNOW the Constitution -- and our states, state governments, and our US Congress-critters and executive ALL need to know this fact.  Shout it from the rooftops!  Email your Congress-critters!  This treaty must NOT be ratified here -- and if ratified, must by NULLIFIED by each and every state, and refused implementation by each and every enforcement office, as utterly unConstitutional and antithetical to our Constitutional Republic.

For a fabulous Constitutional analysis of the treaty-making powers of the US, see the blog by renowned Constitutional scholar Publius Huldah at http://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/category/treaty-making-powers-of-the-united-states/


4 Comments

    Author

    Amateur (in the original meaning) Constitutional scholar and Libertarian.

    Archives

    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2018
    January 2016
    September 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    April 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012

    Categories

    All
    Constitution
    Guns
    History
    Quotes
    Treaty

    RSS Feed

Web Hosting by iPage